There is a misconception that abuse is limited to physicality (or heterosexual relationships) but it’s not. I believe emotional, psychic and psychological abuse is also unacceptable and just as damaging.
There is so much worth rehearsing in our heads, pushing into our ways of being, and practicing in our relationships in those words and in the post below. I’ve been encountering more conversations about intimate partner violence, relational abuse, domestic violence, whichever brand you’re familiar with. And among the many things I question and consider, I come back to how I’ll raise my son to live in the world.
But I’m a pastor and a teacher, and I always (and almost immediately) question what I’m saying and showing and putting forward for the people who are a part of my spheres of ministry and influence. I hope the men especially that I know are doing the same things as they listen to the news, watch television, and engage in barbershop talk.
The sinister evil of abuse is in its pervading, serpent-like ability to creep and dance and stand in culture as if it belongs, as if the world is as it should be when people harm one another. Of course, it is a part of my faith structure, my theology, my talk about God-in-relation-to-God’s-stuff to say that the world is not exactly the way it should be and that such violence is only a grand, bold, and startling show of how bad the world is in these instances.
Relational violence is a narrow version of violence, and violence in its broadest sense is wrong and misdirected and worth our being troubled over and changed by. But this type of violence, this violence that happens between people who supposedly love each other, people who are related to each other, is so destructive.
I tell couples in my church who are preparing for marriage that marriage is so potentially and actually effective, for good or bad, because marriage is one of those mystical vehicles that God uses to initiate, enrich, or nurture grace in our lives. Of course, I can say about other vehicles and not marriage alone, but my point is to say that the impact of marriage is in its strong placement in our lives. We do marriage daily, and when we give ourselves to certain practices daily, those practices–loving practices, misshapen practices, and so forth–eventually because the ways we get whatever we perceive God has for us.
Further, or in other words, marriage specifically and loving relationships more broadly construct how we understand, accept, and exhibit love. Those relationships influence and shape us. So when those relationships are inherently and historically violent, we attach all types of meanings to that violence in the context of a relationship, right?
We think that relationships are supposed to be violent and that when violence isn’t present, the relationship is off. We believe worse things, too, like our prospects for better love or different love are low. We set ourselves into a theological or psychological framework to judge our love and our promise-keeping by our settling with abuse. We believe our faith demands that loyalty and commitment be expressed through the daily submission of our whole selves to the foolish presentation of hatred through words and gestures and the lack of good words and good gestures.
I’m grateful for all the good teachers and tutors who help me walk through the conversations (hushed though they may be) happening in the media these days. This post–and perhaps all the posts over at the Crunk Feminist Collective–needs to make its rounds. Read the full post here. And share it.